Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase
- Journal
- Biochemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/bi00512a013 →Countries where authors are citing Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase
This map shows the geographic impact of Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase
This network shows the impact of Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase.
About Structural identification of autoinducer of Photobacterium fischeri luciferase
This paper, published in 1981, received 725 indexed citations . Written by Anatol Eberhard, A. L. Burlingame, George L. Kenyon and Kenneth H. Nealson covering the research area of Molecular Biology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (629 citations), Genetics (253 citations) and Endocrinology (156 citations). Published in Biochemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/bi00512a013.