Rational Development of Practical Catalysts for Aromatic Carbon−Nitrogen Bond Formation
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar9600650 →Countries where authors are citing Rational Development of Practical Catalysts for Aromatic Carbon−Nitrogen Bond Formation
This map shows the geographic impact of Rational Development of Practical Catalysts for Aromatic Carbon−Nitrogen Bond Formation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rational Development of Practical Catalysts for Aromatic Carbon−Nitrogen Bond Formation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rational Development of Practical Catalysts for Aromatic Carbon−Nitrogen Bond Formation more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Rational Development of Practical Catalysts for Aromatic Carbon−Nitrogen Bond Formation
This network shows the impact of Rational Development of Practical Catalysts for Aromatic Carbon−Nitrogen Bond Formation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Rational Development of Practical Catalysts for Aromatic Carbon−Nitrogen Bond Formation.
About Rational Development of Practical Catalysts for Aromatic Carbon−Nitrogen Bond Formation
This paper, published in 1998, received 1.6k indexed citations . Written by John P. Wolfe, Seble Wagaw, Jean-François Marcoux and Stephen L. Buchwald covering the research area of Organic Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (1.5k citations), Inorganic Chemistry (290 citations) and Molecular Biology (213 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar9600650.