Nanoshell-Enabled Photothermal Cancer Therapy: Impending Clinical Impact
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar800150g →Countries where authors are citing Nanoshell-Enabled Photothermal Cancer Therapy: Impending Clinical Impact
This map shows the geographic impact of Nanoshell-Enabled Photothermal Cancer Therapy: Impending Clinical Impact. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nanoshell-Enabled Photothermal Cancer Therapy: Impending Clinical Impact with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanoshell-Enabled Photothermal Cancer Therapy: Impending Clinical Impact more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Nanoshell-Enabled Photothermal Cancer Therapy: Impending Clinical Impact
This network shows the impact of Nanoshell-Enabled Photothermal Cancer Therapy: Impending Clinical Impact. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Nanoshell-Enabled Photothermal Cancer Therapy: Impending Clinical Impact.
About Nanoshell-Enabled Photothermal Cancer Therapy: Impending Clinical Impact
This paper, published in 2008, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Surbhi Lal, Susan E. Clare and Naomi J. Halas covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (947 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (691 citations) and Materials Chemistry (516 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar800150g.