Function-Oriented Synthesis, Step Economy, and Drug Design
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar700155p →Countries where authors are citing Function-Oriented Synthesis, Step Economy, and Drug Design
This map shows the geographic impact of Function-Oriented Synthesis, Step Economy, and Drug Design. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Function-Oriented Synthesis, Step Economy, and Drug Design with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Function-Oriented Synthesis, Step Economy, and Drug Design more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Function-Oriented Synthesis, Step Economy, and Drug Design
This network shows the impact of Function-Oriented Synthesis, Step Economy, and Drug Design. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Function-Oriented Synthesis, Step Economy, and Drug Design.
About Function-Oriented Synthesis, Step Economy, and Drug Design
This paper, published in 2007, received 1.0k indexed citations . Written by Paul A. Wender, Vishal Verma, Thomas J. Paxton and Thomas H. Pillow covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (847 citations), Molecular Biology (292 citations) and Pharmacology (137 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar700155p.