Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymers: Renewable, Degradable, and Sustainable
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar500121d →Countries where authors are citing Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymers: Renewable, Degradable, and Sustainable
This map shows the geographic impact of Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymers: Renewable, Degradable, and Sustainable. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymers: Renewable, Degradable, and Sustainable with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymers: Renewable, Degradable, and Sustainable more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymers: Renewable, Degradable, and Sustainable
This network shows the impact of Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymers: Renewable, Degradable, and Sustainable. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymers: Renewable, Degradable, and Sustainable.
About Aliphatic Polyester Block Polymers: Renewable, Degradable, and Sustainable
This paper, published in 2014, received 544 indexed citations . Written by Marc A. Hillmyer and William B. Tolman covering the research area of Polymers and Plastics, Process Chemistry and Technology and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomaterials (464 citations), Process Chemistry and Technology (293 citations) and Organic Chemistry (287 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar500121d.