Deep Eutectic Solvents: Sustainable Media for Nanoscale and Functional Materials
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar5000488 →Countries where authors are citing Deep Eutectic Solvents: Sustainable Media for Nanoscale and Functional Materials
This map shows the geographic impact of Deep Eutectic Solvents: Sustainable Media for Nanoscale and Functional Materials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Deep Eutectic Solvents: Sustainable Media for Nanoscale and Functional Materials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Deep Eutectic Solvents: Sustainable Media for Nanoscale and Functional Materials more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Deep Eutectic Solvents: Sustainable Media for Nanoscale and Functional Materials
This network shows the impact of Deep Eutectic Solvents: Sustainable Media for Nanoscale and Functional Materials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Deep Eutectic Solvents: Sustainable Media for Nanoscale and Functional Materials.
About Deep Eutectic Solvents: Sustainable Media for Nanoscale and Functional Materials
This paper, published in 2014, received 784 indexed citations . Written by Durgesh V. Wagle, Hua Zhao and Gary A. Baker covering the research area of Electrochemistry, Polymers and Plastics and Catalysis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Catalysis (487 citations), Materials Chemistry (204 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (171 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar5000488.