Understanding the Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar300028m →Countries where authors are citing Understanding the Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes
This map shows the geographic impact of Understanding the Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Understanding the Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Understanding the Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Understanding the Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes
This network shows the impact of Understanding the Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Understanding the Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes.
About Understanding the Toxicity of Carbon Nanotubes
This paper, published in 2012, received 585 indexed citations . Written by Ying Liu, Yuliang Zhao, Baoyun Sun and Chunying Chen covering the research area of Materials Chemistry and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (351 citations), Biomedical Engineering (327 citations) and Biomaterials (100 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar300028m.