Capacitive Energy Storage in Nanostructured Carbon–Electrolyte Systems
- Authors
- Patrice SimonYury Gogotsi
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar200306b →Countries where authors are citing Capacitive Energy Storage in Nanostructured Carbon–Electrolyte Systems
This map shows the geographic impact of Capacitive Energy Storage in Nanostructured Carbon–Electrolyte Systems. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Capacitive Energy Storage in Nanostructured Carbon–Electrolyte Systems with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Capacitive Energy Storage in Nanostructured Carbon–Electrolyte Systems more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Capacitive Energy Storage in Nanostructured Carbon–Electrolyte Systems
This network shows the impact of Capacitive Energy Storage in Nanostructured Carbon–Electrolyte Systems. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Capacitive Energy Storage in Nanostructured Carbon–Electrolyte Systems.
About Capacitive Energy Storage in Nanostructured Carbon–Electrolyte Systems
This paper, published in 2012, received 1.3k indexed citations . Written by Patrice Simon and Yury Gogotsi covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (1.1k citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (938 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (391 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar200306b.