Borylation and Silylation of C–H Bonds: A Platform for Diverse C–H Bond Functionalizations
- Authors
- John F. Hartwig
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar200206a →Countries where authors are citing Borylation and Silylation of C–H Bonds: A Platform for Diverse C–H Bond Functionalizations
This map shows the geographic impact of Borylation and Silylation of C–H Bonds: A Platform for Diverse C–H Bond Functionalizations. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Borylation and Silylation of C–H Bonds: A Platform for Diverse C–H Bond Functionalizations with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Borylation and Silylation of C–H Bonds: A Platform for Diverse C–H Bond Functionalizations more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Borylation and Silylation of C–H Bonds: A Platform for Diverse C–H Bond Functionalizations
This network shows the impact of Borylation and Silylation of C–H Bonds: A Platform for Diverse C–H Bond Functionalizations. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Borylation and Silylation of C–H Bonds: A Platform for Diverse C–H Bond Functionalizations.
About Borylation and Silylation of C–H Bonds: A Platform for Diverse C–H Bond Functionalizations
This paper, published in 2011, received 931 indexed citations . Written by John F. Hartwig covering the research area of Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (887 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (255 citations) and Materials Chemistry (49 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar200206a.