From Mechanism to Mouse: A Tale of Two Bioorthogonal Reactions
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar200148z →Countries where authors are citing From Mechanism to Mouse: A Tale of Two Bioorthogonal Reactions
This map shows the geographic impact of From Mechanism to Mouse: A Tale of Two Bioorthogonal Reactions. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by From Mechanism to Mouse: A Tale of Two Bioorthogonal Reactions with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites From Mechanism to Mouse: A Tale of Two Bioorthogonal Reactions more than expected).
Fields of papers citing From Mechanism to Mouse: A Tale of Two Bioorthogonal Reactions
This network shows the impact of From Mechanism to Mouse: A Tale of Two Bioorthogonal Reactions. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the From Mechanism to Mouse: A Tale of Two Bioorthogonal Reactions.
About From Mechanism to Mouse: A Tale of Two Bioorthogonal Reactions
This paper, published in 2011, received 902 indexed citations . Written by Ellen M. Sletten and Carolyn R. Bertozzi covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (693 citations), Molecular Biology (577 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (204 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar200148z.