Gold Nanocages: From Synthesis to Theranostic Applications
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar200061q →Countries where authors are citing Gold Nanocages: From Synthesis to Theranostic Applications
This map shows the geographic impact of Gold Nanocages: From Synthesis to Theranostic Applications. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gold Nanocages: From Synthesis to Theranostic Applications with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gold Nanocages: From Synthesis to Theranostic Applications more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Gold Nanocages: From Synthesis to Theranostic Applications
This network shows the impact of Gold Nanocages: From Synthesis to Theranostic Applications. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gold Nanocages: From Synthesis to Theranostic Applications.
About Gold Nanocages: From Synthesis to Theranostic Applications
This paper, published in 2011, received 691 indexed citations . Written by Younan Xia, Weiyang Li, Claire M. Cobley, Jingyi Chen, Xiaohu Xia, Qiang Zhang, Miaoxin Yang, Eun Chul Cho and Paige Brown covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (409 citations), Materials Chemistry (328 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (314 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar200061q.