Theranostic Nanoshells: From Probe Design to Imaging and Treatment of Cancer
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar200023x →Countries where authors are citing Theranostic Nanoshells: From Probe Design to Imaging and Treatment of Cancer
This map shows the geographic impact of Theranostic Nanoshells: From Probe Design to Imaging and Treatment of Cancer. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Theranostic Nanoshells: From Probe Design to Imaging and Treatment of Cancer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Theranostic Nanoshells: From Probe Design to Imaging and Treatment of Cancer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Theranostic Nanoshells: From Probe Design to Imaging and Treatment of Cancer
This network shows the impact of Theranostic Nanoshells: From Probe Design to Imaging and Treatment of Cancer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Theranostic Nanoshells: From Probe Design to Imaging and Treatment of Cancer.
About Theranostic Nanoshells: From Probe Design to Imaging and Treatment of Cancer
This paper, published in 2011, received 752 indexed citations . Written by Rizia Bardhan, Surbhi Lal, Amit Joshi and Naomi J. Halas covering the research area of Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (497 citations), Materials Chemistry (311 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (307 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar200023x.