Tuning the Topology and Functionality of Metal−Organic Frameworks by Ligand Design
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar100112y →Countries where authors are citing Tuning the Topology and Functionality of Metal−Organic Frameworks by Ligand Design
This map shows the geographic impact of Tuning the Topology and Functionality of Metal−Organic Frameworks by Ligand Design. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tuning the Topology and Functionality of Metal−Organic Frameworks by Ligand Design with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tuning the Topology and Functionality of Metal−Organic Frameworks by Ligand Design more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Tuning the Topology and Functionality of Metal−Organic Frameworks by Ligand Design
This network shows the impact of Tuning the Topology and Functionality of Metal−Organic Frameworks by Ligand Design. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Tuning the Topology and Functionality of Metal−Organic Frameworks by Ligand Design.
About Tuning the Topology and Functionality of Metal−Organic Frameworks by Ligand Design
This paper, published in 2010, received 980 indexed citations . Written by Dan Zhao, Daren J. Timmons, Daqiang Yuan and Hong‐Cai Zhou covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry and Process Chemistry and Technology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Inorganic Chemistry (871 citations), Materials Chemistry (596 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (354 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar100112y.