Understanding Hydrogen Atom Transfer: From Bond Strengths to Marcus Theory
- Authors
- James M. Mayer
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar100093z →Countries where authors are citing Understanding Hydrogen Atom Transfer: From Bond Strengths to Marcus Theory
This map shows the geographic impact of Understanding Hydrogen Atom Transfer: From Bond Strengths to Marcus Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Understanding Hydrogen Atom Transfer: From Bond Strengths to Marcus Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Understanding Hydrogen Atom Transfer: From Bond Strengths to Marcus Theory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Understanding Hydrogen Atom Transfer: From Bond Strengths to Marcus Theory
This network shows the impact of Understanding Hydrogen Atom Transfer: From Bond Strengths to Marcus Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Understanding Hydrogen Atom Transfer: From Bond Strengths to Marcus Theory.
About Understanding Hydrogen Atom Transfer: From Bond Strengths to Marcus Theory
This paper, published in 2010, received 755 indexed citations . Written by James M. Mayer covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (407 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (341 citations) and Materials Chemistry (216 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar100093z.