Crystallized Frameworks with Giant Pores: Are There Limits to the Possible?
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar040163i →Countries where authors are citing Crystallized Frameworks with Giant Pores: Are There Limits to the Possible?
This map shows the geographic impact of Crystallized Frameworks with Giant Pores: Are There Limits to the Possible?. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Crystallized Frameworks with Giant Pores: Are There Limits to the Possible? with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Crystallized Frameworks with Giant Pores: Are There Limits to the Possible? more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Crystallized Frameworks with Giant Pores: Are There Limits to the Possible?
This network shows the impact of Crystallized Frameworks with Giant Pores: Are There Limits to the Possible?. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Crystallized Frameworks with Giant Pores: Are There Limits to the Possible?.
About Crystallized Frameworks with Giant Pores: Are There Limits to the Possible?
This paper, published in 2005, received 1.2k indexed citations . Written by Gérard Férey, Caroline Mellot‐Draznieks, Christian Serre and Franck Millange covering the research area of Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Inorganic Chemistry (1.2k citations), Materials Chemistry (731 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (470 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar040163i.