Design, Chirality, and Flexibility in Nanoporous Molecule-Based Materials

1.2k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2005, received 1.2k indexed citations. Written by Darren Bradshaw, John B. Claridge, Edmund J. Cussen, Timothy J. Prior and Matthew J. Rosseinsky covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Inorganic Chemistry (1.1k citations), Materials Chemistry (642 citations) and Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (504 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.

Countries where authors are citing Design, Chirality, and Flexibility in Nanoporous Molecule-Based Materials

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Design, Chirality, and Flexibility in Nanoporous Molecule-Based Materials. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Design, Chirality, and Flexibility in Nanoporous Molecule-Based Materials with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Design, Chirality, and Flexibility in Nanoporous Molecule-Based Materials more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Design, Chirality, and Flexibility in Nanoporous Molecule-Based Materials

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Design, Chirality, and Flexibility in Nanoporous Molecule-Based Materials. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Design, Chirality, and Flexibility in Nanoporous Molecule-Based Materials.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar0401606.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026