Gas-phase reactions of organic anions as studied by the flowing afterglow technique
- Journal
- Accounts of Chemical Research
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ar00065a003 →Countries where authors are citing Gas-phase reactions of organic anions as studied by the flowing afterglow technique
This map shows the geographic impact of Gas-phase reactions of organic anions as studied by the flowing afterglow technique. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gas-phase reactions of organic anions as studied by the flowing afterglow technique with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gas-phase reactions of organic anions as studied by the flowing afterglow technique more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Gas-phase reactions of organic anions as studied by the flowing afterglow technique
This network shows the impact of Gas-phase reactions of organic anions as studied by the flowing afterglow technique. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Gas-phase reactions of organic anions as studied by the flowing afterglow technique.
About Gas-phase reactions of organic anions as studied by the flowing afterglow technique
This paper, published in 1981, received 731 indexed citations . Written by Charles H. DePuy and Veronica M. Bierbaum covering the research area of Organic Chemistry, Physical and Theoretical Chemistry and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (614 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (113 citations) and Molecular Biology (81 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar00065a003.