Development of Novel Lewis Acid Catalysts for Selective Organic Reactions in Aqueous Media

697 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2002, received 697 indexed citations. Written by Shu̅ Kobayashi and Kei Manabe covering the research area of Organic Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (600 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (185 citations) and Molecular Biology (129 citations). Published in Accounts of Chemical Research.

Countries where authors are citing Development of Novel Lewis Acid Catalysts for Selective Organic Reactions in Aqueous Media

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Development of Novel Lewis Acid Catalysts for Selective Organic Reactions in Aqueous Media. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Development of Novel Lewis Acid Catalysts for Selective Organic Reactions in Aqueous Media with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Development of Novel Lewis Acid Catalysts for Selective Organic Reactions in Aqueous Media more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Development of Novel Lewis Acid Catalysts for Selective Organic Reactions in Aqueous Media

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Development of Novel Lewis Acid Catalysts for Selective Organic Reactions in Aqueous Media. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Development of Novel Lewis Acid Catalysts for Selective Organic Reactions in Aqueous Media.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ar000145a.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026