Microfluidic Devices: A Tool for Nanoparticle Synthesis and Performance Evaluation

182 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2023, received 182 indexed citations. Written by Sara Gimondi, Helena Ferreira, Rui L. Reis and Nuno M. Neves covering the research area of Biomedical Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Biomedical Engineering (117 citations), Materials Chemistry (34 citations) and Molecular Biology (33 citations). Published in ACS Nano.

Countries where authors are citing Microfluidic Devices: A Tool for Nanoparticle Synthesis and Performance Evaluation

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Microfluidic Devices: A Tool for Nanoparticle Synthesis and Performance Evaluation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Microfluidic Devices: A Tool for Nanoparticle Synthesis and Performance Evaluation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Microfluidic Devices: A Tool for Nanoparticle Synthesis and Performance Evaluation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Microfluidic Devices: A Tool for Nanoparticle Synthesis and Performance Evaluation

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Microfluidic Devices: A Tool for Nanoparticle Synthesis and Performance Evaluation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Microfluidic Devices: A Tool for Nanoparticle Synthesis and Performance Evaluation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.3c01117.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026