Role of Interfaces in Two-Dimensional Photocatalyst for Water Splitting
- Journal
- ACS Catalysis
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03437 →Countries where authors are citing Role of Interfaces in Two-Dimensional Photocatalyst for Water Splitting
This map shows the geographic impact of Role of Interfaces in Two-Dimensional Photocatalyst for Water Splitting. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Role of Interfaces in Two-Dimensional Photocatalyst for Water Splitting with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Role of Interfaces in Two-Dimensional Photocatalyst for Water Splitting more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Role of Interfaces in Two-Dimensional Photocatalyst for Water Splitting
This network shows the impact of Role of Interfaces in Two-Dimensional Photocatalyst for Water Splitting. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Role of Interfaces in Two-Dimensional Photocatalyst for Water Splitting.
About Role of Interfaces in Two-Dimensional Photocatalyst for Water Splitting
This paper, published in 2018, received 844 indexed citations . Written by Tongming Su, Qian Shao, Zuzeng Qin, Zhanhu Guo and Zili Wu covering the research area of Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment and Materials Chemistry. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment (714 citations), Materials Chemistry (690 citations) and Electrical and Electronic Engineering (297 citations). Published in ACS Catalysis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03437.