Calibration of methanol nuclear magnetic resonance thermometer at low temperature
- Authors
- Anthony L. Van Geet
- Journal
- Analytical Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ac60288a022 →Countries where authors are citing Calibration of methanol nuclear magnetic resonance thermometer at low temperature
This map shows the geographic impact of Calibration of methanol nuclear magnetic resonance thermometer at low temperature. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Calibration of methanol nuclear magnetic resonance thermometer at low temperature with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Calibration of methanol nuclear magnetic resonance thermometer at low temperature more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Calibration of methanol nuclear magnetic resonance thermometer at low temperature
This network shows the impact of Calibration of methanol nuclear magnetic resonance thermometer at low temperature. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Calibration of methanol nuclear magnetic resonance thermometer at low temperature.
About Calibration of methanol nuclear magnetic resonance thermometer at low temperature
This paper, published in 1970, received 713 indexed citations . Written by Anthony L. Van Geet covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Nuclear and High Energy Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Organic Chemistry (308 citations), Spectroscopy (260 citations) and Materials Chemistry (152 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac60288a022.