Quantitative Proteomic Analysis by Accurate Mass Retention Time Pairs

510 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2005, received 510 indexed citations. Written by Jeffrey C. Silva, Richard Denny, Craig A. Dorschel, M. V. Gorenstein, Ignatius J. Kass, Guozhong Li, T. McKenna, Michael Nold, Keith Richardson and P. Young covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (354 citations), Spectroscopy (260 citations) and Plant Science (35 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.

Countries where authors are citing Quantitative Proteomic Analysis by Accurate Mass Retention Time Pairs

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Quantitative Proteomic Analysis by Accurate Mass Retention Time Pairs. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Quantitative Proteomic Analysis by Accurate Mass Retention Time Pairs with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quantitative Proteomic Analysis by Accurate Mass Retention Time Pairs more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Quantitative Proteomic Analysis by Accurate Mass Retention Time Pairs

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Quantitative Proteomic Analysis by Accurate Mass Retention Time Pairs. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Quantitative Proteomic Analysis by Accurate Mass Retention Time Pairs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac048455k.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026