Multiplexed Toxin Analysis Using Four Colors of Quantum Dot Fluororeagents
- Journal
- Analytical Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ac035083r →Countries where authors are citing Multiplexed Toxin Analysis Using Four Colors of Quantum Dot Fluororeagents
This map shows the geographic impact of Multiplexed Toxin Analysis Using Four Colors of Quantum Dot Fluororeagents. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Multiplexed Toxin Analysis Using Four Colors of Quantum Dot Fluororeagents with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Multiplexed Toxin Analysis Using Four Colors of Quantum Dot Fluororeagents more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Multiplexed Toxin Analysis Using Four Colors of Quantum Dot Fluororeagents
This network shows the impact of Multiplexed Toxin Analysis Using Four Colors of Quantum Dot Fluororeagents. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Multiplexed Toxin Analysis Using Four Colors of Quantum Dot Fluororeagents.
About Multiplexed Toxin Analysis Using Four Colors of Quantum Dot Fluororeagents
This paper, published in 2003, received 510 indexed citations . Written by Ellen R. Goldman, Aaron R. Clapp, George P. Anderson, H. Tetsuo Uyeda, J. Matthew Mauro, Igor L. Medintz and Hedi Mattoussi covering the research area of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomedical Engineering and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (374 citations), Materials Chemistry (274 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (236 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac035083r.