A Statistical Model for Identifying Proteins by Tandem Mass Spectrometry
- Journal
- Analytical Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ac0341261 →Countries where authors are citing A Statistical Model for Identifying Proteins by Tandem Mass Spectrometry
This map shows the geographic impact of A Statistical Model for Identifying Proteins by Tandem Mass Spectrometry. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A Statistical Model for Identifying Proteins by Tandem Mass Spectrometry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A Statistical Model for Identifying Proteins by Tandem Mass Spectrometry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A Statistical Model for Identifying Proteins by Tandem Mass Spectrometry
This network shows the impact of A Statistical Model for Identifying Proteins by Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A Statistical Model for Identifying Proteins by Tandem Mass Spectrometry.
About A Statistical Model for Identifying Proteins by Tandem Mass Spectrometry
This paper, published in 2003, received 3.9k indexed citations . Written by Alexey I. Nesvizhskii, Andrew Keller, Eugene Kolker and Ruedi Aebersold covering the research area of Molecular Biology and Spectroscopy. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Molecular Biology (2.6k citations), Spectroscopy (1.2k citations) and Cell Biology (388 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac0341261.