Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis
- Journal
- Analytical Chemistry
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1021/ac00243a035 →Countries where authors are citing Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis
This map shows the geographic impact of Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis
This network shows the impact of Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis.
About Reduction of water with zinc for hydrogen isotope analysis
This paper, published in 1982, received 1.1k indexed citations . Written by Max Coleman, T. J. Shepherd and John J. Durham covering the research area of Geochemistry and Petrology, Ecology and Global and Planetary Change. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Geochemistry and Petrology (625 citations), Geophysics (332 citations) and Atmospheric Science (286 citations). Published in Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1021/ac00243a035.