Home visits: a strategy to improve newborn survival - Authors' reply

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 12.1k indexed citations. Written by Wolfgang Crämer, Patrick Criqui, Jean‐François Guégan, Hervé Le Treut, Thierry Lebel and Franck Lecocq covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (1.5k citations), Epidemiology (1.4k citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (1.3k citations). Published in Americanae (AECID Library).

In The Last Decade

doi.org/10.1016/s0140 →

Countries where authors are citing Home visits: a strategy to improve newborn survival - Authors' reply

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Home visits: a strategy to improve newborn survival - Authors' reply. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Home visits: a strategy to improve newborn survival - Authors' reply with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Home visits: a strategy to improve newborn survival - Authors' reply more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Home visits: a strategy to improve newborn survival - Authors' reply

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Home visits: a strategy to improve newborn survival - Authors' reply. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Home visits: a strategy to improve newborn survival - Authors' reply.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/s0140.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026