Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries
- Authors
- Gustavo CrespiPluvia Zúñiga
- Journal
- World Development
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.010 →Countries where authors are citing Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries
This map shows the geographic impact of Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries
This network shows the impact of Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries.
About Innovation and Productivity: Evidence from Six Latin American Countries
This paper, published in 2011, received 356 indexed citations . Written by Gustavo Crespi and Pluvia Zúñiga covering the research area of Economics and Econometrics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Economics and Econometrics (280 citations), Strategy and Management (127 citations) and General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (63 citations). Published in World Development.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.010.