A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation

295 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2018, received 295 indexed citations. Written by M. Lindner, Moritz Platscher and Farinaldo S. Queiroz covering the research area of Nuclear and High Energy Physics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (288 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (53 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (32 citations). Published in Physics Reports.

Countries where authors are citing A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A call for new physics: The muon anomalous magnetic moment and lepton flavor violation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2017.12.001.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026