The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment

1.6k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2004, received 1.6k indexed citations. Written by Joshua D. Greene, Leigh E. Nystrom, Andrew D. Engell, John M. Darley and Jonathan D. Cohen covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Sociology and Political Science and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Social Psychology (863 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (399 citations). Published in Neuron.

Countries where authors are citing The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.027.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026