Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
- Authors
- Tore DybåTorgeir Dingsøyr
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006 →Countries where authors are citing Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
This map shows the geographic impact of Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
This network shows the impact of Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review.
About Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review
This paper, published in 2008, received 1.7k indexed citations . Written by Tore Dybå and Torgeir Dingsøyr covering the research area of Management of Technology and Innovation and Information Systems. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Information Systems (1.2k citations), Management Information Systems (311 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (292 citations). Published in Information and Software Technology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.01.006.