Finite element modeling of confined concrete-I: Drucker–Prager type plasticity model

380 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2010, received 380 indexed citations. Written by Tao Yu, J.G. Teng, Yi Lin Wong and Shilin Dong covering the research area of Building and Construction and Civil and Structural Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Civil and Structural Engineering (362 citations), Building and Construction (315 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (36 citations). Published in Engineering Structures.

Countries where authors are citing Finite element modeling of confined concrete-I: Drucker–Prager type plasticity model

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Finite element modeling of confined concrete-I: Drucker–Prager type plasticity model. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Finite element modeling of confined concrete-I: Drucker–Prager type plasticity model with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Finite element modeling of confined concrete-I: Drucker–Prager type plasticity model more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Finite element modeling of confined concrete-I: Drucker–Prager type plasticity model

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Finite element modeling of confined concrete-I: Drucker–Prager type plasticity model. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Finite element modeling of confined concrete-I: Drucker–Prager type plasticity model.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.11.014.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026