Analysis-oriented stress–strain models for FRP–confined concrete
- Journal
- Engineering Structures
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.010 →Countries where authors are citing Analysis-oriented stress–strain models for FRP–confined concrete
This map shows the geographic impact of Analysis-oriented stress–strain models for FRP–confined concrete. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Analysis-oriented stress–strain models for FRP–confined concrete with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Analysis-oriented stress–strain models for FRP–confined concrete more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Analysis-oriented stress–strain models for FRP–confined concrete
This network shows the impact of Analysis-oriented stress–strain models for FRP–confined concrete. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Analysis-oriented stress–strain models for FRP–confined concrete.
About Analysis-oriented stress–strain models for FRP–confined concrete
This paper, published in 2007, received 571 indexed citations . Written by Tao Jiang and J.G. Teng covering the research area of Building and Construction and Civil and Structural Engineering. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Civil and Structural Engineering (567 citations), Building and Construction (563 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (12 citations). Published in Engineering Structures.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.01.010.