RECIST 1.1—Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 1.2k indexed citations. Written by Lawrence H. Schwartz, Saskia Litière, Elisabeth G.E. de Vries, Robert Ford, Stephen J. Gwyther, Sumithra J. Mandrekar, Lalitha Shankar, Jan Bogaerts, Alice P. Chen and Janet Dancey covering the research area of Cancer Research, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (633 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (500 citations) and Surgery (268 citations). Published in European Journal of Cancer.

Countries where authors are citing RECIST 1.1—Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of RECIST 1.1—Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by RECIST 1.1—Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites RECIST 1.1—Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing RECIST 1.1—Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of RECIST 1.1—Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the RECIST 1.1—Update and clarification: From the RECIST committee.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2016.03.081.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026