New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)

20.7k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2008, received 20.7k indexed citations. Written by E. Eisenhauer, P. Therasse, Jan Bogaerts, Lawrence H. Schwartz, Daniel J. Sargent, Robert C. Ford, Janet Dancey, Susan G. Arbuck, Stephen J. Gwyther and Margaret Mooney covering the research area of Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (11.1k citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (9.2k citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (4.0k citations). Published in European Journal of Cancer.

Countries where authors are citing New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) more than expected).

Fields of papers citing New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026