Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1950, received 565 indexed citations. Written by Sara Gandini, Francesco Sera, Maria Sofia Cattaruzza, Paolo Pasquini, Damiano Abeni and Peter Boyle covering the research area of Oncology and Epidemiology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Oncology (429 citations), Dermatology (325 citations) and Cell Biology (172 citations). Published in European Journal of Cancer.

Countries where authors are citing Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Meta-analysis of risk factors for cutaneous melanoma: I. Common and atypical naevi.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2004.10.015.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026