A review of continuum mechanics models for size-dependent analysis of beams and plates
- Journal
- Composite Structures
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.040 →Countries where authors are citing A review of continuum mechanics models for size-dependent analysis of beams and plates
This map shows the geographic impact of A review of continuum mechanics models for size-dependent analysis of beams and plates. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A review of continuum mechanics models for size-dependent analysis of beams and plates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A review of continuum mechanics models for size-dependent analysis of beams and plates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing A review of continuum mechanics models for size-dependent analysis of beams and plates
This network shows the impact of A review of continuum mechanics models for size-dependent analysis of beams and plates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A review of continuum mechanics models for size-dependent analysis of beams and plates.
About A review of continuum mechanics models for size-dependent analysis of beams and plates
This paper, published in 2017, received 320 indexed citations . Written by Huu‐Tai Thai, Thuc P. Vo, Trung-Kien Nguyen and Seung-Eock Kim covering the research area of Materials Chemistry, Mechanics of Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Materials Chemistry (310 citations), Mechanics of Materials (288 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (38 citations). Published in Composite Structures.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.040.