A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusion

417 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 2019, received 417 indexed citations. Written by Tongxue Zhou, Su Ruan and Stéphane Canu covering the research area of Neurology, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition and Media Technology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (191 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (183 citations) and Artificial Intelligence (130 citations). Published in Array.

Countries where authors are citing A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusion

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusion. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusion with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusion more than expected).

Fields of papers citing A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusion

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusion. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the A review: Deep learning for medical image segmentation using multi-modality fusion.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1016/j.array.2019.100004.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026