International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics

551 indexed citations
published 1975

Countries where authors are citing International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics more than expected).

Fields of papers citing International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics.

About International Symposium on Mathematical Problems in Theoretical Physics

This paper, published in 1975, received 551 indexed citations . Written by Huzihiro Araki. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Computer Networks and Communications (429 citations), Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (207 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (167 citations). Published in Lecture notes in physics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bfb0013294.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026