Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf03324754 →Countries where authors are citing Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging
This map shows the geographic impact of Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging
This network shows the impact of Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging.
About Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging
This paper, published in 2008, received 474 indexed citations . Written by Anna Oksuzyan, Knud Juel, James W. Vaupel and Kaare Christensen covering the research area of General Health Professions, Health and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health. It is primarily cited by scholars working on General Health Professions (206 citations), Health (180 citations) and Geriatrics and Gerontology (84 citations). Published in Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf03324754.