Analysis on Measure Chains — A Unified Approach to Continuous and Discrete Calculus

1.5k indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1990, received 1.5k indexed citations. Written by Stefan Hilger covering the research area of . It is primarily cited by scholars working on Applied Mathematics (1.3k citations), Numerical Analysis (632 citations) and Control and Systems Engineering (522 citations). Published in Results in Mathematics.

Countries where authors are citing Analysis on Measure Chains — A Unified Approach to Continuous and Discrete Calculus

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Analysis on Measure Chains — A Unified Approach to Continuous and Discrete Calculus. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Analysis on Measure Chains — A Unified Approach to Continuous and Discrete Calculus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Analysis on Measure Chains — A Unified Approach to Continuous and Discrete Calculus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Analysis on Measure Chains — A Unified Approach to Continuous and Discrete Calculus

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Analysis on Measure Chains — A Unified Approach to Continuous and Discrete Calculus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Analysis on Measure Chains — A Unified Approach to Continuous and Discrete Calculus.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf03323153.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026