Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo
- Authors
- Thomas RomerHoward L. Rosenthal
- Journal
- Public Choice
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf03187594 →Countries where authors are citing Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo
This map shows the geographic impact of Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo
This network shows the impact of Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo.
About Political resource allocation, controlled agendas, and the status quo
This paper, published in 1978, received 726 indexed citations . Written by Thomas Romer and Howard L. Rosenthal. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Political Science and International Relations (513 citations), Economics and Econometrics (492 citations) and Strategy and Management (131 citations). Published in Public Choice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf03187594.