The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients

429 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1994, received 429 indexed citations. Written by Dirk‐Matthias Rose and Marsha M. Cohen covering the research area of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (409 citations), Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (297 citations) and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (100 citations). Published in Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie.

Countries where authors are citing The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients more than expected).

Fields of papers citing The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The airway: problems and predictions in 18,500 patients.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf03009858.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026