Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing
- Authors
- Michael S. Fanselow
- Journal
- Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf03001163 →Countries where authors are citing Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing
This map shows the geographic impact of Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing
This network shows the impact of Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing.
About Conditional and unconditional components of post-shock freezing
This paper, published in 1980, received 957 indexed citations . Written by Michael S. Fanselow covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and Social Psychology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (607 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (573 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (479 citations). Published in Pavlovian Journal of Biological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf03001163.