Some errors in respirometry of aquatic breathers: How to avoid and correct for them

499 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1989, received 499 indexed citations. Written by J. F. Steffensen covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation, Water Science and Technology and Ecology. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology (420 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (295 citations) and Aquatic Science (209 citations). Published in Fish Physiology and Biochemistry.

Countries where authors are citing Some errors in respirometry of aquatic breathers: How to avoid and correct for them

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Some errors in respirometry of aquatic breathers: How to avoid and correct for them. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Some errors in respirometry of aquatic breathers: How to avoid and correct for them with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Some errors in respirometry of aquatic breathers: How to avoid and correct for them more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Some errors in respirometry of aquatic breathers: How to avoid and correct for them

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Some errors in respirometry of aquatic breathers: How to avoid and correct for them. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Some errors in respirometry of aquatic breathers: How to avoid and correct for them.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02995809.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026