Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach
- Journal
- The Botanical Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02861082 →Countries where authors are citing Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach
This map shows the geographic impact of Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach
This network shows the impact of Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach.
About Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: An experimental cladistic approach
This paper, published in 1986, received 452 indexed citations . Written by James A. Doyle and Michael J. Donoghue covering the research area of Nature and Landscape Conservation and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (392 citations), Molecular Biology (233 citations) and Plant Science (119 citations). Published in The Botanical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02861082.