On Ö. Winge and a Prayer: The origins of polyploidy
- Authors
- Jack R. HarlanJ. M. J. deWet
- Journal
- The Botanical Review
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02860830 →Countries where authors are citing On Ö. Winge and a Prayer: The origins of polyploidy
This map shows the geographic impact of On Ö. Winge and a Prayer: The origins of polyploidy. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by On Ö. Winge and a Prayer: The origins of polyploidy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites On Ö. Winge and a Prayer: The origins of polyploidy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing On Ö. Winge and a Prayer: The origins of polyploidy
This network shows the impact of On Ö. Winge and a Prayer: The origins of polyploidy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the On Ö. Winge and a Prayer: The origins of polyploidy.
About On Ö. Winge and a Prayer: The origins of polyploidy
This paper, published in 1975, received 470 indexed citations . Written by Jack R. Harlan and J. M. J. deWet covering the research area of Plant Science. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Plant Science (403 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (203 citations) and Molecular Biology (190 citations). Published in The Botanical Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02860830.