Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains

722 indexed citations

Abstract

loading...

About

This paper, published in 1974, received 722 indexed citations. Written by David L. Dilcher covering the research area of Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (578 citations), Plant Science (361 citations) and Molecular Biology (296 citations). Published in The Botanical Review.

Countries where authors are citing Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains

Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains more than expected).

Fields of papers citing Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains

Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02860067.

Explore hit-papers with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026