Quasi-optical approach in quantum field theory
- Artificial Intelligence
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Authors
- A. A. LogunovА.Н. Тавхелидзе
- Journal
- Il Nuovo Cimento
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02750359 →Countries where authors are citing Quasi-optical approach in quantum field theory
This map shows the geographic impact of Quasi-optical approach in quantum field theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Quasi-optical approach in quantum field theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quasi-optical approach in quantum field theory more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Quasi-optical approach in quantum field theory
This network shows the impact of Quasi-optical approach in quantum field theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Quasi-optical approach in quantum field theory.
About Quasi-optical approach in quantum field theory
This paper, published in 1963, received 506 indexed citations . Written by A. A. Logunov and А.Н. Тавхелидзе covering the research area of Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics (336 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (213 citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (88 citations). Published in Il Nuovo Cimento.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02750359.