Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02512476 →Countries where authors are citing Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates
This map shows the geographic impact of Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates more than expected).
Fields of papers citing Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates
This network shows the impact of Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates.
About Interpreting magnetic fields of the brain: minimum norm estimates
This paper, published in 1994, received 1.4k indexed citations . Written by Matti Hämäläinen and Risto J. Ilmoniemi covering the research area of Cognitive Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Signal Processing. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (262 citations) and Signal Processing (212 citations). Published in Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02512476.