The theoretical basis of a method to determine the fracture energyG F of concrete
- Authors
- Arne Hillerborg
- Journal
- Materials and Structures
In The Last Decade
doi.org/10.1007/bf02472919 →Countries where authors are citing The theoretical basis of a method to determine the fracture energyG F of concrete
This map shows the geographic impact of The theoretical basis of a method to determine the fracture energyG F of concrete. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by The theoretical basis of a method to determine the fracture energyG F of concrete with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites The theoretical basis of a method to determine the fracture energyG F of concrete more than expected).
Fields of papers citing The theoretical basis of a method to determine the fracture energyG F of concrete
This network shows the impact of The theoretical basis of a method to determine the fracture energyG F of concrete. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the The theoretical basis of a method to determine the fracture energyG F of concrete.
About The theoretical basis of a method to determine the fracture energyG F of concrete
This paper, published in 1985, received 532 indexed citations . Written by Arne Hillerborg covering the research area of Building and Construction, Civil and Structural Engineering and Mechanics of Materials. It is primarily cited by scholars working on Civil and Structural Engineering (428 citations), Building and Construction (249 citations) and Mechanics of Materials (232 citations). Published in Materials and Structures.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.
This paper is also available at doi.org/10.1007/bf02472919.